Canfield v. Bell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Canfield v. Bell, 149 P. 1088 (Okla. 1915)
47 Okla. 622; 1915 OK 480; 1915 Okla. LEXIS 204
Hardy

Canfield v. Bell

Opinion of the Court

*623 HARDY, J.

This case comes on upon motion to dismiss appeal, because: (1) The case-made was not filed in the court below; (2) the certificate of the judge who tried the case was never attested by the clerk of the county court; and (3) the certificate of the alleged case-made does not affirmatively show that it contains a full, true, and correct transcript of the record in said cause.

It does not appear that the case-made was ever filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, as required by section 5242, Rev. Laws 1910, and, in the absence of a request for leave to withdraw case-made and file same as required by said statute, it will be stricken from the files of this court; and, not being properly certified as a transcript, the petition in error is dismissed. Abbott .v Rogers, 35 Okla. 189, 128 Pac. 908; Peck v. Stephens, 35 Okla. 468, 130 Pac. 276; Montemat v. Johnson, 42 Okla. 443, 141 Pac. 779.

All the Justices concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
CANFIELD Et Al. v. BELL Et Al.
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
- APPEAL AND ERKÜK — 'Case-Matte—Failure ío File and Certify— Dismissal. Where the purported case-made was not filed in the oiiit-e of the clerk of the court in which the trial was had, and same is not properly certified as a transcript of the record, the appeal will he dismissed. (Syllabus by the Court.)