St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Haworth
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Haworth
Opinion of the Court
Opinion' by
This is an action by plaintiff in error, as plaintiff in the trial court, against defendants in error, treasurer and sheriff, respectively, of Canadian' county, as defendants in the trial court, to enjoin the collection of a tax levy of $56.08 for Mustang *133 township, and $63 for school district No. 49, in said county, the same being clearly and far in excess of the amounts required by the estimates made for that year, that is, the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1909, and ending June 30, 1910, which required amounts were duly paid by the plaintiff. A temporary injunction was granted, but, upon the trial of the case, the court denied plaintiff’s prayer for a permanent injunction and dissolved the said temporary injunction.
The defendants in error have, without offer of excuse thérefor, failed to file any brief; and plaintiff’s brief, in which the case of St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Tate, 35 Okla. 563, 130 Pac. 941, is cited and quoted as supporting its demand of relief, at least reasonably tends to sustain its assignment of error in the aforesaid action of the trial court. Also see St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Thompson, 35 Okla. 138, 128 Pac. 685, and Same v. Amend et al., 44 Okla. 602, 145 Pac. 1117.
For the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and remanded, with instructions to enter judgment permanently enjoining the collection of said sums, aggregating $119.08.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.