Keen v. Hiatt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Keen v. Hiatt, 153 P. 861 (Okla. 1915)
54 Okla. 130; 1915 OK 1063; 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1282
PER CURIAM.

Keen v. Hiatt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

A motion has been filed to dismiss this appeal, because it does not affirmatively appear from the record that the order extending the time to make and serve a case was filed in the lower court, and the motion is supported by the affidavit of the clerk of the court that such orders were never filed in the trial court. This motion must be sustained on the authority of Town of Okemah v. Allen, 48 Okla. 757, 150 Pac. 669.

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered'.

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Case-Made—Making and Sex-ving — Extension.— Fixing of Order. The syllabus in Town of Okexnah v. Allen, 48 Okla. 757, 150 Pac. 669. is adopted as the syllabus in this cane. (Syllabus by t.he Court.)