Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915

Foral v. Bogle

Foral v. Bogle
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided January 12, 1915 · Sharp, Swank
146 P. 706; 44 Okla. 805; 1915 OK 25; 1915 Okla. LEXIS 753

Foral v. Bogle

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The proceeding in error in this case is prosecuted by petition in error and case-made. May 23, 1912, counsel for defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the same for the reason, among others, that the case-made fails to show that any notice was either served or waived of the time and place of settling the case-made, and that it did not show that the defendant was present at the time same was settled, or that he suggested amendments thereto, or had the opportunity to do so. An inspection of the record shows that it supports the claims made, and under the law there is no alternative but to sustain the motion.

Under this condition of the record, the case-made must be treated as a nullity, and the cause dismissed. First Nat. Bank of Collinsville v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383, 108 Pac. 748; School Dist. No. 18, Creek County, v. Griffith et al., 33 Okla. 625, 127 Pac. 258; Flathers v. Flathers, 35 Okla. 342, 130 Pac. 134; Phillips v. Koogler, 35 Okla. 438, 130 Pac. 137; Jones v. Jones, 35 Okla. 453, 130 Pac. 139; Pain et al. v. Wylie et al., 35 Okla. 467, 131 Pac. 172; Moore v. Howard Merc. Co., 40 Okla. 491, 139 Pac. 524.

Numerous other grounds are set forth in the motion to dismiss, some, if not all, of which should be sustained. PIow-ever, it is unnecessary to prolong this opinion by setting them forth.

The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed.

By the Court': It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.