Pyle v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma November 9, 1915

Pyle v. Lloyd, 152 P. 1073 (Okla. 1915)

52 Okla. 328; 1915 OK 889; 1915 Okla. LEXIS 287

Galbraith

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This action was instituted to recover upon a promissory note given for building material, and to foreclose a lien upon real estate for the amount thereof. There was a default judgment *329 in the trial court. In this court the cause was assigned for oral argument, but default was also made here, and there has been no brief filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error.

We have examined the record and are convinced that the appeal, is frivolous and without merdit, and has been prosecuted for delay. Skirvin v. Bass Furniture & Carpet Co., 43 Okla. 440, 143 Pac. 190.

We, therefore, recommend that the judgment appealed from be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Reference

Full Case Name: PYLE Et Al. v. LLOYD
Status: Published
Syllabus: APPEAL AND ERROR—Failure to File Brief—Affirmance. Where plaintiff in error fails to file brief under rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix) of this court, and an examination of the record discloses that the appeal is without merit and was prosecuted for delay, the judgment appealed from may be affirmed. (Syllabus by Galbraith, O.)