Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916

Dill v. Marks

Dill v. Marks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided February 15, 1916 · PER CURIAM.
155 P. 521; 53 Okla. 142; 1916 OK 201; 1916 Okla. LEXIS 374

Dill v. Marks

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this case the case-made was filed in, this court on the last day of the. six-months period allowed for perfecting the appeal. Eight days thereafter there was filed with the clerk of this court a purported petition in error, and the cause is now pending. before us on motion to dismiss on the ground that the proceedings were not commenced within the statutory period. The point is well taken, and the appeal must be dismissed. A petition in error is a necessary requisite to the commencement of the proceedings, which “shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of.” Chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11; White v. Hooker et al., 47 Okla. 453, 148 Pac. 719; McMasters v. English et al., 26 Okla. 818, 110 Pac. 1070; Board of County Commissioners v. Oxley, 8 Okla. 502, 58 Pac. 651; Marvel v. White, 5 Okla. 739, 50 Pac. 87.

Dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.