Colter v. Secrest

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Colter v. Secrest, 157 P. 939 (Okla. 1916)
59 Okla. 102; 1916 OK 640; 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1124
Burford

Colter v. Secrest

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BURFORD, C.

This cause was submitted on the 19th day of April, 1916. Plaintiffs in error have filed no briefs. Under the well-established rule of this court, the petition in error should be dismissed. Defendant in error has filed his motion for judgment upon the supersedeas bond. It appears that the judgment was recovered against W. J. Colter, George J. Colter, and G. F. O’Neal for the sum of $1,160, with interest thereon at 6 per cent, per annum from *103 December 4, 1014, until paid, and for costs, and that to supersede said judgment the plaintiffs in error furnished a bond, with S. L. Colter and J. H. Hensen as sureties. On the authority of Long v. Lang, 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, Starr v. Haygood, 53 Okla. 358, 156 Pac. 1171, and the provisions of chapter 249, Sess. Laws 1915, the plaintiff’s motion is sustained.

Judgment will therefore be entered in this court against the sureties on the appeal bond. S. L. Colter and J. H. Henson, in the sum of 81,160, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from December 4, 1914, and for costs, for which execution may issue.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Reference

Full Case Name
COLTER Et Al. v. SECREST
Status
Published