Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918

Flynn v. Ponca City Milling Co.

Flynn v. Ponca City Milling Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided December 31, 1918 · Owen, Kane, Rainey
177 P. 366; 71 Okla. 281; 1918 OK 747; 1918 Okla. LEXIS 944

Flynn v. Ponca City Milling Co.

Opinion of the Court

OWEN, J.

This is an appeal from an award made toy the Industrial Commission in favor of the claimant, Frank Flynn.

Flynn claimed to have been injured toy a flour truck striking him in the side, which resulted in the formation of an abscess on the side of his chest.

.The principal question at issue at the hearing was whether this abscess was the result of the accident. Without notice to cither party, a transcript of the testimony was submitted to the medical adviser of the commission, who gave his written opinion to the effect that the abscess probably resulted from the injury. On this opinion the commission based its findings and conclusion. The statement of this physician was not under oath, and neither party to the cause was given an opportunity to interrogate him or offer additional evidence.

The Attorney General has filed a confession of error based on this action of the commission, and a motion asking that the cause be remanded to- the Industrial Commission for further proceedings.

The cases of Englebretson v. Indus. Accident Com., 170 Cal. 793, 151 Pac. 421, and Pac. Coast Cas. Co. v.. Pillsbury, 171 Cal. 319, 153 Pac. 24, support the confession filed toy the Attorney 'General.

The confession of error and motion to remand will toe sustained. The award will be set aside, and the cause remanded to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings.

All the Justices concur, except KANE and RAINEY, JJ., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.