Milam v. Milam
Milam v. Milam
184 P. 445; 76 Okla. 62; 1919 OK 273; 1919 Okla. LEXIS 124
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Restoration Network (Utah 2012)
- Oven v. Ausley (Fla. 1932)
- City of Alva v. Mason (Okla. 1931)
- Allen v. Board of Com'rs of Logan County (Okla. 1928)
- Butler v. Butler (Okla. 1927)
- Finnell v. Finnell (Okla. 1924)
- City of Bartlesville v. Keeler (Okla. 1924)
- Vogt v. Vogt (Okla. 1923)
- Reynolds v. Reynolds (Okla. 1923)
- O'Farrell v. County of Sonoma (Cal. 1922)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It appears on motion to dismiss this action that plaintiff in error failed to commence proceedings in this court within four months from the date of the decree appealed from as required by section 4971, Rev. Laws 1910. The motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained. Linkugel v. Linkugel, 74 Oklahoma, 183 Pac. 55; Callahan v. Callahan, 47 Okla. 542, 149 Pac. 135.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.