Howe v. Hall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Howe v. Hall, 183 P. 983 (Okla. 1919)
76 Okla. 41; 1919 OK 267; 1919 Okla. LEXIS 114
PER CURIAM.

Howe v. Hall

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by transcript, without bill of exceptions or case-made. A motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by defendant in error. The ease was tried on an agreed statements of facts, and judgment rendered for plaintiff canceling a deed under which the defendant claimed title to the land in controversy. The assignments of error require a consideration of the agreed statement of facts on which the case was tried. It was held in the ease of Brown v. Capital Townsite Co., 21 Okla. 586, 96 Pac. 587, that an agreed statement of facts, not being a part of the record, unless made so by bill of exceptions or case-made, cannot be considered on error, although a copy of it is attached to the transcript of the record.

The “record” proper in a civil action does not include an agreed statement of facts. So. Surety Co. v. Turnham, 58 Okla. 583, 160 Pac. 468; Williams v. Kelly, 71 Oklahoma, 176 Pac. 204; Callahan v. Callahan, 47 Okla. 542, 149 Pac. 135.

Therefore the motion to dismiss must be sustained, and it is so ordered.

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
(Syllabus by the Court.) 1. Appeal and Erroiv-Record Proper— Agreed Facts. An agreed statement of facts, not being a part of the record, unless made so by hill of ■exceptions or case-made, cannot be considered on error, although a copy of it is attached to the transcript of the record. 2. Same. The “record” proper in a civil action does not include an agreed statement of facts.