Harrison v. Corry Pharmacy
Cases that cite this one
20 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ohio Oil Co. v. Sharp (10th Cir. 1943)
- Fisher v. Grider (Okla. 1924)
- Florence Springer v. G. L. Townsend (10th Cir. 1964)
- Scott v. Emanuel (10th Cir. 1954)
- Scott v. Emanuel (10th Cir. 1954)
- McKoy v. Keel (Okla. 1933)
- Whitney v. Schwabacher (Okla. 1931)
- Wynn v. Fugate (Okla. 1931)
- Brandon v. Claxton (Tex. App. 1930)
- Teuscher v. Gragg (Okla. 1929)
- Smith Bros., Inc. v. Lucas (Tex. App. 1928)
- Anicker v. Harrison (Okla. 1926)
- Jones v. Merfeldt (Okla. 1924)
- Ginner & Miller Publishing Co. v. N. S. Sherman Machine & Iron Works (Okla. 1923)
- Sanders v. Leforce (Okla. 1923)
- Farmers' Nat. Bank of Maysville v. Vaughn (Okla. 1923)
- Pluto Oil & Gas Co. v. Miller (Okla. 1923)
- Mills v. Williams (Okla. 1922)
- Mills v. Stewart (Okla. 1922)
- Brink v. Canfield (Okla. 1919)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This was an action instituted by one C. W. Harrison to recover from the Corry Pharmacy and others on a promissory note.
The case is very similar to cause No. 9620, Fred L. Stevens v. Oklahoma Automobile Company et al., this day decided (ante, p. 126), and the cases are briefed on the same theory. The decision, therefore, in cause No. 9620 is decisive of the propositions herein involved.
The cause is therefore reversed, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial. 1
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.