Wright v. Waggoner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Wright v. Waggoner, 193 P. 982 (Okla. 1920)
80 Okla. 56; 1920 OK 384; 1920 Okla. LEXIS 146
Higgins, Rainey, Harrison, Kane, Pitchford, Johnson, McNeill, Bailey, Collier

Wright v. Waggoner

Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, J.

This cause was submitted April 20, 1920. In accordance with a stipulation duly filed plaintiffs in error were granted 30 days from that date within which to file their brief. On May 26, thereafter, plaintiffs in error were granted a further extension of 30 days. No briefs having been filed in the cause within the extensions of time granted and no further time having been requested (47 Oklá. vi; 165 Pac. vii), the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16, 183 Pae. 880; Cantwell ‘v. Patterson, 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 754; Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10.

RAINEY, C. J., and HARRISON, KANE. PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, McNEILL, BAILEY, and COLLIER, JJ., concui;.

Reference

Full Case Name
WRIGHT Et Al. v. WAGGONER Et Al.
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
(Syllabus by tbe Court.) Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief— Dismissal. Where no briefs are filed, as required by rule 7, (47 Okla. yi; 165 Pae. vii) of the Supreme Court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.