McGowen v. Ring

Supreme Court of Oklahoma February 10, 1920

McGowen v. Ring, 187 P. 465 (Okla. 1920)

77 Okla. 193; 1920 OK 63; 1920 Okla. LEXIS 221

Rainey, Kane, Pitchford, Johnson, Mc-Neill, Higgins

Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, J.

This cause was submitted in its regular order on December 10, 1919, but was stricken from the assignment and continued until the February term. An order was entered giving plaintiff in error 15 days from that date in which to file brief. No brief having been filed, and no extension of time requested, the cause is dismissed for want of prosecution. Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10.

KANE, PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, Mc-NEILL, and HIGGINS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: McGOWEN Et Al. v. RING
Status: Published
Syllabus: (Syllabus by the Court.) Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief— Dismissal. Where cause was submitted in regular order, and plaintiff in error was given extended time in which to file briefs, and no briefs were filed, and no further extension of time requested, the cause will be dismissed for want of prosecution.