Hazelwood v. Robe
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Hazelwood v. Robe, 192 P. 566 (Okla. 1920)
79 Okla. 214; 1920 OK 306; 1920 Okla. LEXIS 73
Higgins, Rainey, Harrison, Kane, Pitchford, Johnson, McNeill, Bailey
Hazelwood v. Robe
Opinion of the Court
The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal herein taken. There is no response filed.
In the petition in error it is not assigned as error that the trial court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.
The plaintiffs in error complain of error on the part of the trial court occurring during the progress of the .trial.
In Nichols v. Dexter, 52 Okla. 152, 152 Pac. 817, it is stated:
“Where the overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error in the petition in error, errors alleged to (have occurred during the trial are not properly presented, and cannot be reviewed.”
The appeal is dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- HAZELWOOD Et Al. v. ROBE
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- (Syllabus by the Court.) Appeal and Error — Assignment of Errors— Overruling Motion for New Trial — Dismissal. Appeal dismissed for reason stated in the opinion.