This was an action for damages for personal injuries, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff, to reverse, which this proceeding in error was commenced.

As this ease differs in no material respect in either the facts or the questions of law involved from Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. A. P. Wilson, 84 Okla. 118, 202 Pac. 275, and Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. Ila McGhee, 84 Okla. 116, 202 Pac. 277, in which opinions have been this day handed down, it will not be' necessary to restate the facts or reconsider the assignments of error pre^ sented for review.

Upon the authority of the former cases, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.