This record discloses that motion for new trial was overruled December 22, 1919, and plaintiff given 60 days, in addition to the 15 days provided by law, to serve ease-made: March 5, 1920, an extension of 60 days additional was granted, May 4, 1920, an extension of 15 days in addi *118 tion to the time already granted was made, making 150 days in all for serving ease-made, which expired May 20, 1920; the case-made was not served until May 22nd, two days after the time had expired.

Under the rule heretofore followed, a purported case-made, which has not been served within 15 days from the date of the Judgment or order appealed from, or within an extension of time duly allowed, cannot be consider, d by this court for lack of jurisdiction. Cook v. Cook, 79 Okla. 222, 192 Pac. 215; Cripple Creek Oil Co. v. King, 76 Okla. 316, 185 Pac. 439; Morgan v. Board of Co. Com’rs, 59 Okla. 290, 159 Pac. 514; Wills v. Buzbee, 42 Okla. 206, 140 Pac. 1146; Gilbert v. Divelbiss, 47 Okla. 340, 148 Pac. 689.

This case might be reviewed as upon a transcript, having been filed within six months from the date of final judgment, but as the p tition in error presents no question reviewable upon transcript, there is nothing before this court. Cook v. Cook, supra; Thompson v. Stevens, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 742; Collins v. Garvey, 67 Oklahoma, 171 Pac. 330.

For these reasons, the appeal is dismissed.