Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922

Rigdon v. Claypool & Wheeler

Rigdon v. Claypool & Wheeler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided June 27, 1922 · McNeill, Harrison, Johnson, El-Ting, Nicholson
207 P. 974; 86 Okla. 262; 1922 OK 228; 1922 Okla. LEXIS 176
Rigdon v. Claypool & Wheeler

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

McNEILL, J.

This proceeding was instituted in this court by George B. Rigdon against Claypool & Wheeler, Associated Employers' Reciprocal, and the State Industrial Commission to reverse an order of the Industrial Commission denying the claimant compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The questions involved are identical with the case of Walter Canode v. Claypool & Wheeler et al. (No. 12976. this day decided), 86 Okla. 262, 207 Pac. 974, and the questions there decided control the questions involved in this case.

Tire order of the Industrial Commission is affirmed upon authority of the case of Canode v. Claypool & Wheeler et al. (No. 12976, this day decided).

HARRISON, C. J„ and JOHNSON, EL-TING, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.