Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Oklahoma /Cases /Supreme Court of Oklahoma /

1922

366 Supreme Court of Oklahoma opinions from 1922.

  • Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Donahoe 209 P. 442, (Okla. 1922)
  • Branham v. Carter Oil Co. 209 P. 400, (Okla. 1922)
  • Alko-Nak Coal Co. v. Barton 212 P. 591, (Okla. 1922)
  • Adams v. Power 209 P. 395, (Okla. 1922)
  • Murphey v. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. 214 P. 695, (Okla. 1922)
  • Bank of Buchanan County v. Priestly 209 P. 412, (Okla. 1922)
  • Stutsman v. Williams 209 P. 406, (Okla. 1922)
  • Butler v. Carter 209 P. 965, (Okla. 1922)
  • Cromwell v. Hamilton 209 P. 395, (Okla. 1922)
  • Kerfoot v. Greenlee 209 P. 444, (Okla. 1922)
  • Ewing v. Ewing 209 P. 440, (Okla. 1922)
  • Parks v. Roach 210 P. 402, (Okla. 1922)
  • Schaff v. Hudgins 221 P. 90, (Okla. 1922)
  • New England Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. Broyles 209 P. 312, (Okla. 1922)
  • One Hudson Automobile v. State 209 P. 223, (Okla. 1922)
  • Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. Berry 210 P. 141, (Okla. 1922)
  • Nelson v. York 209 P. 425, (Okla. 1922)
  • Ireland v. Chatman 209 P. 408, (Okla. 1922)
  • Dunlap v. Morean 208 P. 773, (Okla. 1922)
  • Mullen Coal Co. v. Scavage 208 P. 771, (Okla. 1922)
  • Brisley v. Mahaffey 209 P. 920, (Okla. 1922)
  • York v. Trigg 209 P. 417, (Okla. 1922)
  • Jenkins v. Helms 213 P. 322, (Okla. 1922)
  • Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial Commission 208 P. 266, (Okla. 1922)
  • Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial Commission 211 P. 491, (Okla. 1922)
  • Nixon v. Harter 208 P. 804, (Okla. 1922)
  • Phillips v. State Industrial Commission 208 P. 261, (Okla. 1922)
  • Hughes v. Senter 212 P. 311, (Okla. 1922)
  • Skelly Oil Co. v. Globe Oil Co. 209 P. 321, (Okla. 1922)
  • United States Zinc Co. v. Ross 208 P. 805, (Okla. 1922)
  • Nixon v. Good 208 P. 803, (Okla. 1922)
  • Constantin Refining Co. v. Crockett 208 P. 788, (Okla. 1922)
  • Livingston Oil Corporation v. Henson 208 P. 774, (Okla. 1922)
  • Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial Commission 208 P. 798, (Okla. 1922)
  • Hudson v. Johnson 209 P. 325, (Okla. 1922)
  • Seamans Oil Co. v. Davis 208 P. 802, (Okla. 1922)
  • Lawrence v. Carey 207 P. 969, (Okla. 1922)
  • Seamans Oil Co. v. Mitchell 208 P. 801, (Okla. 1922)
  • Huff v. Oklahoma State Bank 207 P. 963, (Okla. 1922)
  • Leforce v. Cooper 208 P. 795, (Okla. 1922)
  • Neary v. Etenburn 209 P. 649, (Okla. 1922)
  • Knebel v. Rennie 209 P. 414, (Okla. 1922)
  • Brown v. Minter 207 P. 976, (Okla. 1922)
  • White v. Sallee 208 P. 214, (Okla. 1922)
  • Canode v. Claypool & Wheeler 207 P. 976, (Okla. 1922)
  • New v. Bradshaw 214 P. 557, (Okla. 1922)
  • Dodge v. Bishop 207 P. 968, (Okla. 1922)
  • Urie v. Board of Education of Pryor Creek 208 P. 210, (Okla. 1922)
  • Chowning v. Ledbetter 208 P. 829, (Okla. 1922)
  • E. R. Thomas Motor Car Co. v. Robb 208 P. 783, (Okla. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑