Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923

Rugg v. Layton

Rugg v. Layton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided September 18, 1923 · Stephenson
218 P. 660; 92 Okla. 262; 1923 OK 647; 1923 Okla. LEXIS 857

Rugg v. Layton

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

The plaintiffs commenced their original action in this court for a writ of certiorari to the county superintendent of Canadian county, to send up the record and proceedings had before the county superintendent in the matter of changing the boundary of a school district. This cause was regularly submitted. The plaintiff has failed to file his brief as required by the rule of this court. Where the plaintiff, or plaintiff in error, fails to prepare, serve, and file brief, as required by the rules of this court, after a cause has been set down for hearing, and fails to request an extension of time for so doing, the cause will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Therefore, it is recommended that this cause be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.