Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923

Hammons v. Langford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided February 13, 1923 · Meneill, Johnson, Kane, Kenna-Mer, Nicholson, Cochran, Bran-Son

212 P. 985; 88 Okla. 241; 1923 OK 95; 1923 Okla. LEXIS 610

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Beindorf v. Thorpe (Okla. 1927)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MeNEILL, J.

Tbe questions involved in this appeal are identical with the question involved in the case of Mobley v. Langford, No. 10863, this day decided by this court. The facts are practically the same. The same hind and character of supersedeas bond is involved, but the tract of land involved was different. The parties have briefed the cases together and rely upon the same assignments of error, and the giving of the same instructions by the court, and the refusing to give the same instructions requested as in case No. 10863.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed and upon authority of the case of Mobley v. Langford, this day decided.

JOHNSON, Y. O. J. and KANE, KENNA-MER, NICHOLSON, COCHRAN, and BRAN-SON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.