Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Scott
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Scott
236 P. 417; 108 Okla. 268; 1925 OK 362; 1925 Okla. LEXIS 159
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- City of Choctaw v. Jorco II, LLC (Okla. Civ. App. 2008)
- City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma State Pension & Retirement Board (Okla. 1983)
- Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa County (Okla. 1935)
- Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. (Okla. 1932)
- State v. City of Tulsa (Okla. 1931)
- Protest of Chicago R. I. & P. Ry. Co. (Okla. 1931)
- Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Boyd (Okla. 1929)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Upon the authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469, 106 Pac. 957, this cause is reversed and remanded for new trial for failure of the defendant in error to file a brief as provided in rule 7 of this court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.