Aztec Oil Co. v. Dague
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Cherry v. State (Okla. Crim. App. 1937)
- Brooks v. Titus (Okla. 1933)
- Parker v. Rennie (Okla. 1929)
- Kershaw v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County (Okla. 1929)
- Steil v. Marshall (Okla. 1928)
- Mooney v. State Ex Rel. Sullivan (Okla. 1927)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Motion for new trial was overruled on the 19th day of October, 1925, and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was given 45 days from date of order in which to serve case-made. This time expired on the 3rd day of December, 1925. Case-made w,as not served within this time, and on the 4th day of December, 1925, the iconrt made a further order of extension. Defendant in error moves the court to dismiss appeal on tlie ground that 'the trial court was without jurisdiction to make the order of December 4, 1925, for the reason that the time granted .previously had expired.
Where the time for serving ease-made ■has expired, an order of extension made subsquent thereto is void, and this court is without jurisdiction to review the case on appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.