Sparkman v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Maney v. Cherry (Okla. 1935)
- Ford Motor Credit Company v. R. Kenneth Milburn and Jane B. Milburn, Husband and Wife and Bobby J. Rogers and Marilyn A. Rogers, Husband and Wife (10th Cir. 1980)
- Thomas v. Belcher (Okla. 1939)
- Furst v. Lucas (Okla. 1936)
- Griffin v. Lange Co. (Okla. 1935)
- Long v. Furst (Okla. 1935)
- R. J. Watkins Co. v. Peterson (Iowa 1930)
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. Pruitt (Okla. 1928)
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Langeland (Wash. 1927)
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Boyd (Tenn. Ct. App. 1926)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
The plaintiff below, opposing attorneys, and the issues are the same, and the evidence tendered by the defendants is in effect the same, as in the case of I. J. Gordon et al. v. W. T. Raw-leigh Co., No. 14285, this day decided, infra, p. 235. The opinion and syllabus in thp.t case are adopted as the opinion and syllabus in this case, and the judgment 'is affirmed.
Defendant in error in this case hrs asked for a judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond filed herein, in the event the judgment of the trial court should ■ be affirmed, it appearing that judgment herein was superseded by a bond on which R. D. Pratt and J. H. Pruitt were sureties. Judgment is therefore rendered against the said sureties on the supersedeas bond.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.