Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930

Ex Parte Lively

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided January 14, 1930 · Riley, Mason, Lester, Clark, Hunt, Hefner, Oullison, Swindall, Andrews

284 P. 2; 141 Okla. 85; 1930 OK 24; 1930 Okla. LEXIS 22

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

State Bd. of Medical Examiners v. Weiner (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
M. Dietz & Sons, Inc. v. Miller (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
HOFF EX REL. HOFF v. Natural Refining Products Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

RILEY, J.

The petitioner, seeking release from the custody of the sheriff of Oklahoma county, whose warrant and authority is a commitment directing that petitioner be confined in the county jail until he obeys a certain maintenance order, and “until otherwise ordered by the court”, brings himself clearlv within the rule announced in Re John Curtis, 10 Okla. 660, 63 Pac. 963. See, also, Wells v. Wells, 46 Okla. 88, 148 Pac. 723. He is therefore entitled to be released. Writ granted.

MASON, C. J. , LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, HUNT, HEFNER, OULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ, concur.

Note. — See “Contempt,’’ 33 C. J. § 131, p. 86, n. 33.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.