New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City
Cases that cite this one
23 later published cases cite this decision.
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Curtis (10th Cir. 1950)
- Warren v. Bank of Marion (District Court, W.D. Virginia 1985)
- Chickasaw Telephone v. Southwestern Bell (10th Cir. 1997)
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Bonney (United States District Court, Oklahoma Western 1969)
- Ellison v. Skelly Oil Co. (Okla. 1951)
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Curtis (United States District Court, Oklahoma Eastern 1949)
- Chamerda v. Opie (Conn. App. Ct. 2018)
- Yerion v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2014)
- Marshall v. American Federation of Government Employees (United States District Court, Oklahoma Western 1998)
- Chickasaw Telephone Co. v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. (10th Cir. 1997)
- Hamilton v. Amwar Petroleum Co., Inc. (Okla. 1989)
- Hosey v. Central Bank of Birmingham, Inc. (Ala. 1988)
- Duer v. Hoover & Bracken Energies, Inc. (Okla. Civ. App. 1986)
- Zehner v. Post Oak Oil Co. (Okla. Civ. App. 1982)
- Paul Wm. Polin and Marsha Polin v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (10th Cir. 1975)
- Misco Leasing, Inc., Formerly Intercontinental Leasing, Inc. v. L. L. Keller (10th Cir. 1974)
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Bonney (United States District Court, Oklahoma Western 1969)
- Frankfort Oil Company, a Division of Carstairs Bros. Distilling Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation v. W. F. Snakard (10th Cir. 1960)
- Berryman v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. (10th Cir. 1947)
- McCrabb v. Moulton (8th Cir. 1942)
- Noble v. Johnson (Okla. 1937)
- Keiser v. Kile (Okla. 1933)
- Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. (Okla. 1933)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is a companion case to No. 19796, entitled “New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. First National Bank, Oklahoma City et al.,” this day decided by this court. (154 Okla. 74, 6 P. (2d) 779.) The parties are the same, except that in case No. 19796 the Exchange National Bank of Ardmore was codefendant with the First National Bank of Oklahoma City, Okla. In the case at bar, the American. National Bank of Ardmore is a eodefendant with the First National Bank of Oklahoma City. The pleadings, evidence, agreed stipulation of facts and briefs are substantially the same as in case No. 19796. In the case at bar the check involved is in the sum of $6,461.05, being one of the two cashier’s checks of the First National Bank of Oklahoma City mentioned in said cause No. 19796 payable to “S. F. Haynie, County Treasurer.” The same was indorsed by “S. F. Haynie, County Treas. urer, Carter County, Okla., and presented to said American National Bank of Ardmore instead of to said Exchange National Bank. The American National Bank paid the proceeds thereof to said S. F. Haynie individually, upon his request, and the same was misappropriated by said Haynie to the detriment of Carter county.
In view of the opinion in case No. 19796, we hold that the principles of law therein announced are controlling herein, and that the judgment of the trial court should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.