Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931

Narcomey v. Hull

Narcomey v. Hull
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided April 28, 1931 · Riley, Lester, Hefner, Culli-Son, Swindall, Andrews, McNeill, Kornegay, Clark
5 P.2d 758; 148 Okla. 259; 1931 OK 194; 1931 Okla. LEXIS 873 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Narcomey v. Hull

Opinion of the Court

RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, with which this case, together with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLI-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑