Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932

Rushing v. Carter Oil Co.

Rushing v. Carter Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided October 4, 1932 · McNeill, Lester, Clark, Riley, Oullison, Swindall, Andrews, Kornegay, Heener
15 P.2d 571; 160 Okla. 97; 1932 OK 653; 1932 Okla. LEXIS 689 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Rushing v. Carter Oil Co.

Opinion of the Court

McNEILL, J.

This is a proceeding to review an order and award of the State Industrial Commission. Attorneys for petitioner introduced their evidence before the Commission in support of their motion for further compensation on the ground of change of condition. The Commission found that the evidence was insufficient, and petitioner seeks to have this judgment reviewed. Suffice it to say that the Commission is the finder of facts. There is competent evidence to support the finding of facts, as made by tbe Commission, that the evidence was insufficient. Affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, OULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNEGAY, JJā€ž concur. HEENER, J., absent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.