Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Ary

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided September 13, 1932 · Lester, Clark, Riley, Hefner, Oullison, Swin-Dall, Andrews, Kornbgay

14 P.2d 385; 159 Okla. 73; 1932 OK 608; 1932 Okla. LEXIS 558 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Elk City Cotton Oil Co. v. State Industrial Commission (Okla. 1939)
Briscoe Const. Co. v. Listerman (Okla. 1933)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

McNEILL, J.

This is an original action to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made oil. February 5, 1982. The Commission entered its order and award allowing the respondent 62% weeks’ compensation for ten per cent, permanent disability for each foot and five per cent, permanent disability of left arm. The only contention of petitioner is that the compensation made by the Industrial Commlission is erroneous in that the Commission erred in computing the disability as to the specific members and basing the same on 500 weeks. The award as made by tbe Commission is proper. See Dolese Bros. Co. v. Roberts, 155 Okla. 198, 8 P. (2d.) 756.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK. V. O. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, OULLISON, SWIN-DALL, ANDREWS, and KORNBGAY, JJ., concur.

Note.—See under (1) annotation, in L. R A. 1916A, 257; 28 R. C. L. 820, 821.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.