Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932

Wilson & Co. v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided June 28, 1932 · McNeill, Hefner, Cullison, Swindall, Andrews, Kornegay, Lester, Clark, Riley

12 P.2d 693; 158 Okla. 140; 1932 OK 513; 1932 Okla. LEXIS 948 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Wilson & Co. v. Moore (Okla. 1933)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

McNEILL, J.

Review of an award made by Industrial Commission. The major proposition involved is whether there is competent evidence to substantiate the award, as to the permanency of respondent’s disability, due to the dislocation of his shoulder. The injury was compensable. If it is permanent, respondent is entitled to the award. A review of this record does not justify an award for permanent disability. The cause is remanded to the Commission, with directions to hear further testimony on this question. If respondent fails to produce competent evidence showing the permanency of such disability, the Commission is directed to dismiss the same.

HEFNER,- CULLISON, SWINDALL, and *141 ANDREWS, JJ., concur. KORNEGAY, J., dissents. LESTER, O. J., CLARK, V. O. J.,. and RILEY, J., absent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.