Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933

Ross v. Corporation Commission

Ross v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided September 12, 1933 · Hus'By, Riley, Cullison, Swindall, Andrews, McNeill, Osborn, Bayless, Welch
25 P.2d 710; 165 Okla. 209; 1933 OK 467; 1933 Okla. LEXIS 296 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Ross v. Corporation Commission

Opinion of the Court

HUS'BY, J.

This is a companion case to cause No. 24132, Oils Incorporated v. Corporation Commission et al., this date decided. (165 Okla. 202, 25 P. (2d) 703.) The same property is involved as well as the same period of production. The eases differ only in that the plaintiffs in error in this case are royalty owners, whereas, in cause No. 2(4132 the plaintiff in error was the operator. The legal questions involved which are material to a determination of the issues are identical. The causes have been considered together in, this court, and the ultimate rights of the parties in this ease have been determined in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in cause No. 24132.

The opinion in cause No. 24132 is therefore adopted as the opinion in this case, and this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to proceed in a manner not inconsistent with the views announced.

RILEY, C. X, CULLISON, Y. C. X, and SWINDALL. ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, BAYLESS, and WELCH, JX, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.