Courter Oil Co. v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Courter Oil Co. v. Oklahoma City, 31 P.2d 596 (Okla. 1934)
167 Okla. 633; 1934 OK 209; 1934 Okla. LEXIS 639
Andrews, Bayless, Busby, Cullison, McNEILL, Osborn, Riley, Swindall

Courter Oil Co. v. Oklahoma City

Opinion of the Court

McNEILL, J.

This appeal involves the failure of the Courter Oil Company, plaintiff in error, to post a bond in the supi of $200,000, as required by Ordinance 3944 of the city of Oklahoma City in reference to drilling of an oil and gas well within the TJ-7 drilling zone of said city.

We consider it unnecessary to discuss this question. This same question has received our consideration. See Gant v. Oklahoma City, 150 Okla. 86, 6 P. (2d) 1065; Gant v. Oklahoma City, 160 Okla. 62, 15 P. (2d) 833, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States, 289 U. S. 99, 77 L. Ed. 1058, 53 S. Ct. 530; C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Oklahoma City, 167 Okla. 384, 29 P. (2d) 952, and Hud Oil & Refining Co. v. Oklahoma City, 167 Okla. 457, 30 P. (2d) 169; and Morgan Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma City, 167 Okla. 632, 31 P. (2d) 594.

Judgment affirmed.

CULLISON., V- C. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, OSBORN, and BUSBY, JJā€ž concur. RILEY, C. J., and BAYLESS and WELCH, JJ., absent.

Reference

Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published