Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935

Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Stubblefield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided November 19, 1935 · Riley, McNeill, Osborn, Busby, Gibson

51 P.2d 502; 174 Okla. 601; 1935 OK 1129; 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1325 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Jordan v. Peek (Okla. 1954)
Jones v. Stemco Manufacturing Co. (Okla. 1981)
Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Donahey (Okla. 1951)
Pine v. Duncan (Okla. 1937)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

RILEY, J.

The defendants have filed in this cause a confession of error, wherein they plead that the decision of this court in the case of Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Ross, 173 Okla. 524, 49 P. (2d) 184, is decisive of all the questions involved in the instant appeal.

In accord with the prayer contained in the confession of error, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded, with directions to issue a writ of injunction as sought by the prayer contained in the petition of plaintiff below, plaintiff in error.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and BUSBY and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.