St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board
47 P.2d 177; 172 Okla. 607
(Pacific Reporter, Second Series)
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board
Opinion of the Court
The sole question here in *608 volved has been determined by the court in Morley v. State ex rel. Board of Education, City of Tulsa, 171 Okla. 46, 47 P. (2d) 170, where it was held in paragraph 1 of the syllabus that:
“Under the provisions of chapter 85, Session Laws 1933, a surplus balance and net unincumbered ad valorem taxes in the process of collection within legal limitations, are available for appropriation in addition to the amount that may be raised by ad valorem taxation.”
See, also, Protest of St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 169 Okla. 64, 38 P. (2d) 513, to the same effect.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.