Scott v. Watt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Scott v. Watt, 52 P.2d 1059 (Okla. 1935)
175 Okla. 426; 1935 OK 1171; 1935 Okla. LEXIS 913
Riley, McNeill, Osborn, Bayless, Busby, Welch, Corn, Gibson, Phelps

Scott v. Watt

Opinion of the Court

RILEY, J.

The plaintiffs below, plaintiffs in error, sought by this action injunc-tive process to restrain and prevent the enforcement of ordinance No. >4624, city of Oklahoma City. From an adverse judgment an appeal has been perfected. The issue presented is determined by the decision in Allen v. Oklahoma City et al., 175 Okla. 421, 52 P. (2d) 1054, this day determined. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to proceed in conformity with the views expressed in the cited companion cause.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, Y. C. J., and BAYLESS, BUSBY, WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. PHELPS, J.. not participating.

Reference

Full Case Name
SCOTT Et Al. v. WATT, Chief of Police, Et Al.
Status
Published