Cooke v. Kutin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma December 1, 1936

Cooke v. Kutin, 64 P.2d 693 (Okla. 1936)

179 Okla. 157; 1936 OK 745; 1936 Okla. LEXIS 810

Bayless, Busby, Corn, Gibson, McNEILL, Osborn, Phelps, Riley, Welch

Opinion of the Court

OSBORN, V. C. J.

It is conceded by the parties that the issues of law and fact in I his case are identical with the issues involved in the case of Charles B. Cooke v. John B. Kinkead et al., 179 Okla. 347, 64 P. (2d) 682, this day decided by this court, and that the opinion of the court in that case is controlling of the issues involved in this case.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

BUSBY, WELCH, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur. McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, and GIBSON, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name: COOKE v. KUTIN Et Al.
Status: Published