Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936

Harner v. Beese

Harner v. Beese
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided February 4, 1936 · Meneill, Bayless, Welch, Corn, Gibson
54 P.2d 321; 175 Okla. 641; 1936 OK 115; 1936 Okla. LEXIS 72 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Harner v. Beese

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The record shows a certificate of the trial judge, as follows:

“I do now settle, allow, certify and sign the same as a true, correct, full and complete ease-made, and do hereby order and direct that the same be attested by the clerk of this court, and seal attached thereto, and that said case-made be thereupon filed by said clerk with the papers in said cause.”

The signature of the trial judge was not attested by the court clerk, the seal of the court was not attached thereto, and said case-made was never filed by said clerk with the papers in said cause. The statute (section 534, O. S. 1931) provides affirmatively that the case-made shall be attested by the clerk and the seal of the court attached, and shall then be filed with the papers in the case. This court has uniformly held that the statute above quoted is mandatory. See Miller v. Berryman, 169 Okla. 524, 37 P. (2d) 975, and cases therein cited.

The appeal is dismissed.

The Supreme Court acknowledges the aid of Attorneys Frank Wells and B'. B. Blak- *642 eney in the preparation of this opinion. These attorneys constituted an advisory committee selected by the State Bar, appointed by the Judicial Council, and approved by the Supreme Court. After the analysis of law and facts was prepared by Mr. Wells and approved by Mr. Blakeney, the cause was assigned to a Justice of this court for examination and report to the court. Thereafter, upon consideration, this opinion was adopted.

MeNEILL, C. J., and BAYLESS, WELCH. CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.