Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937

Blumhoff v. Akers

Blumhoff v. Akers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided September 21, 1937 · Osborn, Riley, Phelps, Hurst, Davison
71 P.2d 733; 180 Okla. 589; 1937 OK 485; 1937 Okla. LEXIS 512 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Blumhoff v. Akers

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

A motion to dismiss has been filed on the ground that the appeal was-not filed until more than six months after the date of the judgment rendered. On July 31, 1937, this court called for a response by the plaintiff in error. No response has been filed and no excuse is offered for the failure to comply with the order of this court.

Under the rule announced in French v. Bragg, 177 Okla. 43, 55 P. (2d) 953, it is not the duty .of this court to search for some theory upon which to sustain the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

OSBORN, C. J., and RILEY, PHELPS, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.