Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938

City of Tulsa v. Stroud

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided January 18, 1938 · Osborn, Bayless, Riley, Welch, Phelps, Corn, Gibson, Hurst, Davi-Son

75 P.2d 434; 181 Okla. 525; 1938 OK 26; 1938 Okla. LEXIS 10 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Hough v. Leonard (Okla. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On July 6, 1937, plaintiff in error filed petition in error with case-made attached in this court and on August 27, 1937, the brief was filed by the plaintiff in error.

The defendant in error has failed to file any brief or offer any excuse for such failure. The cause- is, therefore, reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate and set aside the order and judgment heretofore rendered for the plaintiff and to grant a new trial. Chapman v. Taylor, 163 Okla. 274, 21 P. (2d) 1058.

OSBORN, C. J., BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur. DAVI-SON, J., absent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.