Gooldy v. Hines
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Roberts (Okla. 1955)
- Sautbine v. Pierce (Okla. 1954)
- Coon v. Maddox (Okla. 1953)
- City of Hartshorne v. State ex rel. Wilson (Okla. 1952)
- Fore v. Fore (Okla. 1950)
- State Ex Rel. Sprague, Co. v. One Pin Ball Machine Styled" Nevada" (Okla. 1950)
- Morgan v. Stratton (Okla. 1947)
- State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. Brooks (Okla. 1947)
- Fleming v. Wright (Okla. 1947)
- Goodwin v. Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 23 (Okla. 1946)
- City of Tulsa v. Cockrell (Okla. 1945)
- Cantwell v. McDonald (Okla. 1945)
- O'Shaughnessy v. Musgrave (Okla. 1944)
- Miller v. Miller (Okla. 1944)
- Cowgill v. Francis (Okla. 1944)
- Moore v. Board of Comr's of Seminole County (Okla. 1943)
- Richardson v. Inge (Okla. 1943)
- Neal v. Lyman (Okla. 1943)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court, and on November 25, 1938, he filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded, with directions.
The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the plaintiff and grant a new trial.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.