Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1943

Data v. Ghigo & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided May 11, 1943 · Arnold, Bayless, Corn, Davison, Gibson, Hurst, Osborn, Riley, Welch

137 P.2d 556; 192 Okla. 445; 1943 OK 172; 1943 Okla. LEXIS 192 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Anderson v. State ex rel. Burnett (Okla. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against her and on December 2, 1942, filed her brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under the authority of Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d *446 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon ■which to sustain the action of the trial court.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.