Dean v. Paschall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma December 7, 1943

Dean v. Paschall, 143 P.2d 819 (Okla. 1943)

193 Okla. 342; 1943 OK 395; 1943 Okla. LEXIS 400

Corn, Gibson, Riley, Osborn, Bayless, Welch, Hurst, Davison, Arnold

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

A motion to dismiss has been filed which alleges that the premises involved in the litigation are no longer in possession of the plaintiff in error and that the appeal has become moot. This motion is not resisted although this court called for a response to the motion to dismiss. Under such circumstances, as stated in Doerner v. Layton, 171 Okla. 522, 43 P. 2d 741, the appeal may be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Dean v. Paschall.
Status: Published