Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1943

Dean v. Paschall

Dean v. Paschall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided December 7, 1943 · Corn, Gibson, Riley, Osborn, Bayless, Welch, Hurst, Davison, Arnold
143 P.2d 819; 193 Okla. 342; 1943 OK 395; 1943 Okla. LEXIS 400 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Dean v. Paschall

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

A motion to dismiss has been filed which alleges that the premises involved in the litigation are no longer in possession of the plaintiff in error and that the appeal has become moot. This motion is not resisted although this court called for a response to the motion to dismiss. Under such circumstances, as stated in Doerner v. Layton, 171 Okla. 522, 43 P. 2d 741, the appeal may be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.