Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1948

Rodecker v. Long

Rodecker v. Long
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided October 12, 1948 · Corn, Davison, Gibson, Hurst, Luttrell, Riley, Welch
200 Okla. 595; 198 P.2d 638; 1948 OK 219; 1948 Okla. LEXIS 383

Rodecker v. Long

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against her in the trial court. On May 5, 1947, *596she filed her brief. The ' authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendants in error have filed no brief and have offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed.

Reversed for a new trial.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.