Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1948

Earley v. Baughman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided November 3, 1948 · No. 33743 · Hurst, Davison, Riley, Gibson, Luttrell

200 Okla. 649; 199 P.2d 210; 1948 OK 237; 1948 Okla. LEXIS 398

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

City of Tulsa v. Carr (Okla. Civ. App. 2008)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendants, Edward Earley et al., from a judgment enforcing a restrictive covenant against the sale of real property to members of the Negro race. The defendants in error have filed here*650in a confession of error, citing in support thereof Shelley v. Kraemer, 92 L. Ed. 845, which case was decided after the rendition of the judgment appealed from. The confession of error is reasonably sustained by the record, and the judgment should be reversed. Public Service Co. v. City of Vinita, 192 Okla. 291, 135 P. 2d 57.

Reversed, with directions to dismiss the cause.

HURST, C. J., DAVISON, V. C. J., and RILEY, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.