Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1990

B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Easley

B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Easley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided September 18, 1990 · Hargrave, Hodges, Lavender, Simms, Wilson, Opala, Kauger, Summers
798 P.2d 610; 1990 OK 86; 61 O.B.A.J. 2373; 1990 Okla. LEXIS 93; 1990 WL 135810 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Easley

Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Chief Justice.

During the pendency of this appeal, this Court decided Coy v. Dover Corp., 773 P.2d 745 (Okla. 1989), which articulated a reasonably prudent person test which applies to the statute of limitations for cumulative trauma workers’ compensation claims. THE COURT FINDS, from a review of the record and briefs submitted in this case, that the Coy decision is disposi-tive of the issue presented.

Rule 1.201 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases provides that “[i]n any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision.” Okla.Stat. tit. 12, chap. 15, app. 2 (Supp. 1983).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the orders of the Workers’ Compensation Court are vacated. The case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Court for application of Coy’s reasonably prudent person test.

DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 18th DAY OF September, 1990.

HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS and ALMA WILSON, JJ., concur. OPALA, V.C.J., concurs in result. KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

SUMMERS, Justice,

dissenting:

I would withdraw the Order granting certiorari and let the Court of Appeals opinion control the case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.