McCullough v. Mathews
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Boswell v. Schultz (Okla. 2007)
- St. Clair v. Hatch (Okla. 2002)
- Edward Brown v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 9338 Wilderness Glen Avenue (District Court, D. Nevada 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ issue prohibiting respondent judge, or any other assigned judge, from enforcing that portion of the order dated May 11,1995, in Cause No. CJ-93-519-66 on the docket of the District Court, Oklahoma County, prohibiting an attorney or lawyer from being the representative of the person to be examined and from being present at that examination. There is no such restriction in 12 O.S.1994 § 3235(D). The role of that statutory representative, whether an attorney or otherwise, is generally passive in nature and limited to that of an observer.
Respondent judge did not abuse his discretion in allowing hand written notes to be taken by the representative. However, audio recording of the examination should be allowed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.