Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1997

Gray v. Upp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided July 8, 1997 · Hargrave, Hodges, Kauger, Lavender, Opala, Simms, Summers, Watt, Wilson

943 P.2d 592; 1997 OK 98; 1997 Okla. LEXIS 91; 1997 WL 381753 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Matter of JT (Okla. Civ. App. 1998)
State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Trisler (Okla. Civ. App. 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

¶ 1 Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ of mandamus issue. The respondent is directed in Oklahoma County District Court Case No. JF-93-1424, styled In the Matter of Sasha Gray, Shawandra Gray, Danyelle Neal, Jr., and Shareka Gray Neal, alleged deprived children, to allow the mother a jury trial on proceedings to terminate her parental rights, pursuant to the Due Process Clause of Oklahoma’s Constitution and this Court’s decisions in A.E. v. State, 743 P.2d 1041, 1047 (Okl. 1987) and Matter of D.D.F., 801 P.2d 703, 705 (Okl. 1990).

¶ 2 We hold that the 1990 Amendment to Oklahoma Constitution, Art. 2, § 19 neither repealed nor negated the right of a parent to be tried by his/her peers in a proceeding to determine whether there shall be a permanent parting of the bonds linking parent to child.

¶ 3 KAUGER, C.J., SUMMERS, V.C.J., HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, WILSON, and WATT, JJ., concur. ¶ 4 OPALA, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.