Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2001

Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided December 4, 2001 · Hargrave, Watt, Hodges, Lavender, Boudreau, Winchester, Opala, Kauger, Summers

37 P.3d 881; 2001 OK 109; 72 O.B.A.J. 3672; 2001 Okla. LEXIS 128; 2001 WL 1530361 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION

11 In this case, THE COURT FINDS, from a review of the record and briefs submitted, that the recent decision in Autry v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund, 2001 OK 79, 38 P.3d 218 (2001) is dispositive of the issues presented. Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[In any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. Stat. tit. 12, chap. 15, app. (Supp. 1997).

12 IT IS THEREFOR ORDERED that the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is vacated. The award of benefits by the Workers' Compensation Court from the Multiple Injury Trust Fund is sustained.

13 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 3rd day of December, 2001.

1 4 HARGRAVE, C.J., WATT, V.C.J., HODGES, LAVENDER, BOUDREAU, and WINCHESTER, JJ., concur. 15 OPALA, KAUGER, and SUMMERS, JJ., concur in result.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.