Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2011

Fent v. Fallin

Fent v. Fallin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided September 26, 2011 · Taylor, Colbert, Watt, Edmondson, Combs, Gurich, Reif, Winchester, Kauger
2011 OK 100; 271 P.3d 798; 2011 Okla. LEXIS 108; 2011 WL 5924384

Fent v. Fallin

Opinion

ORDER

Having considered the petitioner's application to assume original jurisdiction and petition for declaratory relief and writs of injunction and/or mandamus, the brief in support thereof along with the appendix, and the respondent's response thereto, THE COURT DETERMINES:

1) Original jurisdiction is assumed and declaratory relief is granted.
2) To the extent that the Oklahoma Quick Action Fund, 62 O.S. Supp.2011 § 48.2(G), requires the Governor's consultation with legislative leadership before making a final determination of approval for an expenditure from the fund, it violates the Okla. Const. art. 4, § 1 extending separate and distinet powers to each department of government. Fent v. Contingency Review Bd., 2007 OK 27, 163 P.3d 512.
3) Subsection G of 62 O.S. Supp.2011 § 48.2(G) is unconstitutional and void. Nevertheless, the provision is severable from the remainder of the legislative enactment which otherwise stands unaffected by this order. Fent v. Contingency Review Bd., supra.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that original jurisdiction is assumed and declaratory relief is granted. Title 62 0.8. Supp.2011 § 48.2(G) is unconstitutional and void. The offending provision is severable from the balance of the section which stands unaffected by this order.

TAYLOR, C.J., COLBERT, V.C.J., WATT, EDMONDSON, COMBS, GURICH, JJ., concur. REIF, J., dissents. WINCHESTER, J., not participating. KAUGER, J., disqualified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.