ANDERSON v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND
ANDERSON v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND
Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION
{1 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[in any case in
{ 2 After reviewing the record in this case, THE COURT FINDS that our recent decision in Ball v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund, 2015 OK 64, 360 P.3d 499 disposes of the issues in this case.
¶3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Court of Civil Appeals opinion in this case is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the Workers' Compensation Court.of Exist. ing Claims for further proceedings.
DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 16TH day of November 2015 '
Dissenting Opinion
dissent.
I dissent for the same reasons stated in my dissent in the Ball case.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Rhonda HIATT, Petitioner, v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND and the Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published