Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2016

In re the Reinstatement of Kakish

In re the Reinstatement of Kakish
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided January 12, 2016
365 P.3d 1067; 2016 OK 3; 2016 Okla. LEXIS 3; 2016 WL 130265 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

In re the Reinstatement of Kakish

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

I 1 The petitioner, Kim Kakish, was stricken from the roll of attorneys in September 21, 2009, for Mandatory Continuing Legal Education noncompliance. The petitioner seeks reinstatement to the Oklahoma Bar Association by Petition for Reinstatement filed June 17, 2015. The Trial Panel recommended in their report by unanimous vote that reinstatement be granted. Upon consideration of the matter, we find:

1. Petitioner has met all the procedural requirements necessary for reinstate ment in the Oklahoma Bar Association as set out in Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S. 2011, ch. 1, app. 1-A;

3.Affidavits were presented showing that the petitioner has not engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in the State of Oklahoma during the period of her resignation;

4.Petitioner possesses the competency and learning in the law required for admission to practice law in the State of Oklahoma.

2. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition for Reinstatement be granted.

T8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall pay the costs associated with this proceeding in the amount of $26.30.

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.